Rick Owens on purpose. Not a sizing mistake, not a factory error, just the actual design choice. The whole silhouette is built around volume and drape, and that only works if there’s more fabric in the piece than a normal fitted cut would ever have. Let me actually get into why, since “it’s just the style” doesn’t tell you much on its own.
Dramatic drape, layered proportions, a coat that pools around your body instead of hugging it, none of that happens with a tight, standard cut. Drape needs slack fabric to actually move and hang the way it’s supposed to. Cut that same coat close to the body and the whole effect just disappears, you’re left with a regular coat.
So the size isn’t there for comfort reasons or whatever. It’s structural. The look literally can’t exist without that extra room.
Normal sizing is about fitting the body as closely and predictably as it can. officialrickowens.com is doing something else entirely, elongating proportions, exaggerating shoulders or hemlines, building volume where a fitted piece wouldn’t have any. Different goal completely, which is part of why comparing it to a size chart from some other brand just doesn’t work the way you’d hope.
It’s a design choice, really, more than a sizing quirk. Some people love that effect, some really don’t, and that’s just taste, not the clothing being right or wrong.
Part of the “runs big” reputation isn’t even about the cut, it’s the labels themselves. A lot of pieces use European sizing instead of US or UK numbers, and people assume their usual size number just carries over, which it usually doesn’t. Stack that mismatch on top of intentionally oversized cuts and suddenly the gap feels even bigger than it actually is. This part has nothing to do with design honestly, it’s just a labeling difference tripping people up on top of everything else.
Outerwear and tops show this the most, since that’s where drape and volume actually matter to the look. Trousers and shoes stay closer to standard sizing within their own lane, though even there it swings a lot by style, a slim tapered pant and a wide draped one aren’t sized the same at all even within the same brand.
So checking the chart for whatever specific category you’re buying beats assuming “runs big” applies evenly across the whole catalog.
Comparing your actual measurements against the item’s specific chart beats guessing off your usual size somewhere else, every time. Want the oversized, drapey look it’s built for? Stick with your normal size or go up. Want something closer to a standard fit instead? Sizing down a notch is pretty common for tops and outerwear.
Neither one’s the “correct” choice by the way, it just depends what you’re going for.
Is the oversized fit a mistake, or is it intentional? Intentional, through and through. It’s a deliberate part of the design in a lot of categories, especially outerwear and tops, not some sizing inconsistency.
Does everything run oversized? No. Trousers and shoes stay closer to standard within their own category even though outerwear and tops lean heavily oversized.
Should I size down if the oversized thing isn’t for me? Usually yeah, for tops and outerwear specifically. One size down tends to land you closer to a normal silhouette.
Does this apply the same to men’s and women’s lines? Mostly, yeah, especially outerwear and looser pieces, which is exactly why people shop across both lines depending on what actually fits them.
What’s the most reliable way to nail the size? Compare your real measurements to the chart for that exact item. Don’t trust your usual size from somewhere else to carry over.
The oversized fit isn’t a fluke, it’s the whole point of how the silhouette is built. Drape needs that extra fabric to do what it does, and it shows up most in outerwear and tops. Checking the actual chart for the piece you’re after, instead of assuming based on your usual size elsewhere, is still your best bet.